I’ve read many places, and pretty much agree, that the church plant in it’s early stages, no matter what people say, doesn’t follow and build off of the vision of the leader. The infant church plant instead builds off of and follows the leader himself. What does this mean? The leader must be the vision in flesh. He must embody the vision in every aspect possible, so that as the church plant grows, it can wean off of the leader and onto the vision. Off of infant milk, and onto solid foods, as the Apostle Paul would write. People are drawn to the leader in the early stages, but if the leader embodies the vision, they will transition easily.
This also means, however, that the leader of a church plant must be able to say, as Paul did, “follow me, because I follow Christ”. The church, being built around and off of it’s leader, must be built on Christ as well. Notice that if the leader is a fully devoted follower of Christ and he embodies the vision, then the vision is Christ-centered. Isn’t it nice how things fit together like that? But to a church plant, who reaches mainly non-Christians, being Christ-centered is hard (even impossible) to achieve without the leader being a carbon copy of Christ sans atoning capabilities. The leader of the baby church must also be a lover of Scripture, if the church is ever going to love Scripture. He must be a prayer, if the church is ever going to have a praying culture. We so often neglect these things, and look at “personality” of the leader and “style” of the church. Yes, they are hand in hand, but the redemptive and disciplinal qualities (or lack thereof) of the leader are integrated into the church plant as well.